| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 454 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
National Housing Bank vs International Housing Finance Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 395752]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
S.V.T. Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. vs M. Palanisami and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 375853]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
German Homoepathic Distributors (P) Ltd. vs Deutsche Homeopathic-Union DHU Arzneimittel GMBH and Co. KG
Winding up-Jurisdiction of Company Court-A winding up order passed by the Single Judge of the Delhi High Court was set aside. The Single Judge, while passing the order, had exceeded the juris [LexDoc Id : 368152]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Kunnamkulam Paper Mills Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI and Anr.
Offer of rights shares with a right to renounce shares: Shares issued to more than 50 persons-Jurisdiction on Central Government in relation to companies not coming within description of s.55A(a) and s.55A(b), No right to SEBI to usurp such jurisdiction, No presumption of jurisdiction by depending on any constructive provisions-The first petitioner, a public limited company, had declared an offer for a right issue of its shares to its shareholders with a right to renounce the [LexDoc Id : 433628]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Ruchi Worldwide Ltd.
Policy holder: Natural born person or even a juristic person-Complaint filed by a company under rule 13 maintainable in law-A policy-holder could be a natural born person, or even a juristic person, such as an incorporated company, who held an interest in the policy, either [LexDoc Id : 383676]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
J.R. Srinivas and Ors. vs Sri Gururaja Enterprises (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 380207]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Kitply Industries Ltd. vs California Pacific Trading Corpn.
Winding up of company-Decree of foreign court-Proceeding under s.439 of the Companies Act 1956 was not a proceeding for execution of a decree. Consequently, the objections raised by the appellant [LexDoc Id : 376931]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2009 |
Manohar Lal Sharma vs UOI and Anr.
Appeal to high court: Appeal against decision or order of CLB-Period of limitation, Power of high court to entertain appeal within a further specified period-An appeal against any decision or order of the Company Law Board was provided to the high court, within sixty days from the date of communication of d [LexDoc Id : 378616]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2009 |
Devaraj Dhanram vs Firebricks and Potteries (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Transfer of Shares-Transfer to third party-The Company Law Board was right in concluding that the sale of shares to the third party was in accordance with the articles of association of the res [LexDoc Id : 376932]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
Jeth Mal Surana vs Pioneer Colours and Coatings (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 386558]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Riddhi Sidhi Infraprojects (P) Ltd. vs ROC
Power of Registrar to strike defunct company off register-Name struck off due to companys failure to file annual returns-The Registrar of Companies had struck off the name of the company from the Register of Companies on account of company’s failure to file annual return [LexDoc Id : 385180]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2009 |
Shakumbari Sugar and Allied Industrial Ltd., In re
Reduction in share capital: Shareholders not objection to reduction-Confirmation of reduction allowed-The company had filed a petition seeking a reduction in its share capital. A notice was given to all the shareholders and creditors and a resolution w [LexDoc Id : 383691]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
Jeth Mal Surana and Ors. vs Pioneer Colours and Coatings (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 383519]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Ashok Kumar and Ors. vs Shree Janki Cold Storage (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 383412]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Weizmann Ltd., Weizmann Financial Resources (P) Ltd., Om Mitra Securities Ltd., Mitra Fidelity Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI and Adjudicating Officer
[LexDoc Id : 374582]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Kuljinder Singh Ahluwalia vs Sandeep Kaur Ahluwalia, Ravinder Singh Ahluwalia, Muktanand Corpn., Mukat Pipes Ltd., Mandeep A. Pahwa, Rupinder Singh and Kamal Jain
[LexDoc Id : 367518]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Alok H. Prapanna vs OL of Mayo Hospitals Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 395744]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Reliance Petroleum Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 381131]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Blailklock Compass World Transport (HK) Ltd. vs OL and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400237]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Khatri Essence (P) Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Assurance of petitioner-companies to follow accounting standard 14-The petitioner-companies i.e. the transferor and transferee-companies had sought for sanction to their scheme of amalgamation. Meetings of shareholder [LexDoc Id : 384504]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
Ram Parshotam Mittal and Anr. vs Hillcrest Realty SDN. BHD. and Ors.
Companies Act 1956: Status of a company-Private company vis-a-vis Public company-It was not the records of the Registrar of Companies, which determined the status of a company but whether it fell within the definition of a ‘private [LexDoc Id : 367152]
|
SC |
2009 |
Reliance Communications Ltd., In re
Reliance Infratel Ltd., In re
Scheme of arrangement: Creditors not affected by arrangement-Non-service of notice of hearing of petition to one creditor not to affect sanction of scheme-The apprehension of the creditor-objector of the demerged company that the company had already substantial secured loan and had huge liability and in [LexDoc Id : 372833]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Marble City Hospital and Research Center (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Sarabjeet Singh Mokha
[LexDoc Id : 391961]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
Marble City Hospital and Research Centre (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Sarabjeet Singh Mokha
Removal from directorship of company: Service of notice-Failure to prove service of notice, Meetings held without proper service of notice-The respondent was removed as the director of the company on the ground that in spite of sending him notices by post i.e. under certificate of posting [LexDoc Id : 381128]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. vs R.K. Dhall and Ors. (No. 1)
Oppression and mismanagement: CLB restraining company and its directors-Directions issued without recording reasons-The petitioner, a shareholder of the appellant-company, filed a petition under s.397 and s.398 of the Companies Act wherein an application for interim [LexDoc Id : 389521]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
